Talk:Washington State Route 231

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleWashington State Route 231 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 10, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 231/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC) This article looks very good overall. I have a few minor concerns:Reply

  • The "Route description" section would probably work better if it was split into two paragraphs.
    • Done
  • "State Route 231 (SR 231) begins at SR 23 0.79 miles (1.27 km) north of Sprague and a diamond interchange with Interstate 90" - this means that it also begins 0.79 miles north of the diamond interchange?
    • SR 23 doesn't begin 0.79 mi north of the I-90 interchange, fixed
  • "0.72 miles (1.16 km) north of the bridge, SR 231 intersects" - it's generally preferred to avoid opening sentences with numerals.
    • Fixed
  • "The Spokane River Bridge was added to the National Register of Historic Places" - was any reason given for this?
    • Gave reason: along w/ rest of downriver bridges away from Spokane

Aside from those, I don't see any problems for a GA pass. I'll put the nomination on hold for a week and keep this page on my watchlist. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Some of your sentences in History have three citations; that is kind of ridiculous. --Rschen7754 (T C) 09:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to have missed these fixes. The article and the review are on my watchlist, so I don't know how that slipped by me. I'm still a little unsure about one point. Does SR 231 begin 0.79 miles north of the diamond interchange? If it does, that's fine. I just can't quite tell from the way it's written. If I could get some clarification on this, I will promote the article. The added information about the other bridges is helpful. If a reason for the bridges standing out enough to be added to the register could be found, that would also be great. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The highway does start 0.79 miles north of the interchange and the bridges don't seem to have another reason for registering. – ĈĠ, Super Sounders Fan (help line|§|sign here) 22:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sounds great. Thanks. I'll promote the article right away. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:15, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Washington State Route 231. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Washington State Route 231. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply