Talk:Washington State Route 292/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 15:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links

Prose

Lede

• Sheep Creek - Am I to assume this is a river? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
  • It's a small stream and not likely to meet notability requirements, hence why I've left it unlinked.

General

• Should probably state the full name of the road on the first use in body. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Added.
• WSDOT isn't used again in the body. No need to acronym Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Added a later use.
• $1.3 million needs conversion to todays money. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Added.
• A few of your citations have an error - this is because url-status is used without a archive-url. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Not sure which citation is throwing up those errors, as the two citations using url-status both have archived URLs. SounderBruce 05:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Review meta comments

• I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
  • @Lee Vilenski: Thanks for the review. I think I've addressed everything. SounderBruce 04:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Happy to promote - I'm getting someone to look at a script/bot to make the passing of GANs a bit more streamlined. They'll be doing the close. As I know you are trying to get this one passed before the end of the WikiCup, drop me a ping if this doesn't happen in the next two days, and I'll promote manually. :) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
      • @Lee Vilenski: It doesn't seem to have gone through. SounderBruce 06:03, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.