Talk:Washington State Route 308

Latest comment: 11 years ago by TCN7JM in topic GA Review
Good articleWashington State Route 308 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 17, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 308/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 02:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

After the Slam Dunk Contest. –TCN7JM 02:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Route description

  • I don't think on is the best adjective in the first sentence. Maybe with?
    •   Changed to with

Final verdict

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall: Good job! Just this one thing. –TCN7JM 02:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
    Pass/Fail: 
Passing the article! –TCN7JM 04:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply