Talk:Washington State Route 308
Latest comment: 11 years ago by TCN7JM in topic GA Review
Washington State Route 308 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 308/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 02:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
After the Slam Dunk Contest. –TCN7JM 02:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Route description
- I don't think on is the best adjective in the first sentence. Maybe with?
- Changed to with
Final verdict
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Good job! Just this one thing. –TCN7JM 02:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Passing the article! –TCN7JM 04:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)