Talk:Washington State Route 503

Orphaned references in Washington State Route 503

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Washington State Route 503's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "log":

• From Washington State Route 529: Washington State Department of Transportation, State Highway Log, 2006
• From Washington State Route 527: Washington State Department of Transportation. "State Highway Log, 2006" (pdf). Retrieved 2008-09-24.
• From Washington State Route 599: Washington State Department of Transportation. "State Highway Log, 2006" (pdf). Retrieved 2008-09-28.
• From Washington State Route 538: Washington State Department of Transportation. "State Highway Log, 2006" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-04-22.
• From Washington State Route 543: "State Highway Log - Planning Report" (PDF). Washington State Department of Transportation. 2007. pp. pg 1562. Retrieved 2008-08-17. {{cite web}}: |pages= has extra text (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 503/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 03:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • As with SR 17, there are a lot of instances of commas followed by -ing verbs. Most of these should be reworded.

   •  Done Reduced to 4 in the RD (not including the AADT)

   • The sentence "The highway crosses the East Fork of the Lewis River and leaves Battle Ground to pass Lewisville Park, listed on the National Register of Historic Places,[11] located in the community of the same name, heading northeast into a heavily forested region of the Cascades foothills." needs to be split.

   •  Done

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a couple fixes to be made. Dough4872 02:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

I will now pass the article. Dough4872 02:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

"six-phase plan to provide congestion relief to the 502/503 corridor..."

Hey everyone,

Local news article about recent completions of a third part of a six-phase overhaul project involving the 502 & 503 routes, here - [1]. Looks like the 503 page is lacking any of this project so this is more a heads up if someone finds it worthy to add (and it's not my strong suit, so I leave it up to experienced transpo writers). I'll go ahead and post this on the 502 talk page as well.

Cheers! Shortiefourten (talk) 18:06, 25 September 2023 (UTC)