Talk:Water by the Spoonful

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Premeditated Chaos in topic GA Review
Former good article nomineeWater by the Spoonful was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 22, 2024Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Water by the Spoonful/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 23:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yet another QF of one of the mass-nominated articles. A large part of the "Concept" section is uncited. Production section and critical reception sections are both bullet point lists. Why is publication jammed in under critical reception? Why is Hudes' 2008 Tony mentioned here? Inexplicable. The nominator has enough experience to know that this is completely unacceptable, yet nominated the article anyway, desperate for WikiCup points. Absolutely not. I would not fail a less experienced nominator on those grounds, but I have zero interest in giving someone who should know better a free pass just for fake internet points. ♠PMC(talk) 23:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.