Talk:Waterville, Maine

Latest comment: 5 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Waterville, Maine

Muskie

edit

http://abacus.bates.edu/muskie-archives/OralHistories/MuskieOHFA.shtml

Is this wrong? Muskie ran unsuccessfully for mayor. I don't think George Mitchell also ran unsuccessfully. If he did, we now know that losing the mayor's race makes you become Senator (ha ha, but true!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spevw (talkcontribs) 02:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Waterville maine seal.jpg

edit
 

Image:Waterville maine seal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Abrams?

edit

Is J.J. Abrams really a resident...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.146.139.90 (talkcontribs) 15:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

center of what?

edit

The opening paragraph states, "...Waterville is the regional commercial, medical and cultural center." Of which region? "Region" is a very broad term and could mean anything from the county to the state to New England, depending on the reader's point of view and pre-existing knowledge of the area (or lack thereof). This could use some clarification. Furthermore, the reference for this statement is a publication from 43 years ago. A lot can change in 43 years, and a lot HAS changed in that time in central Maine. 64.185.130.217 (talk) 20:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's been a few months and no one has provided a newer reference or a clearer/more-specific statement, so I removed it. 64.185.131.107 (talk) 17:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Waterville, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

C.F. Hathaway Company

edit

The article asserts that the evil Warren Buffett's evil Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. purchased the floundering shirt company and closed it. It cites someone's college paper as its source, but I'm unable to find an indictment of Berkshire Hathaway anywhere in the paper. The paper states that the shirt company lowered its quality standards in a effort to be price-competitive, and when that didn't work out, some locals took the helm, reinstating the quality standards. But this didn't pan out, either, and in 2002, they locked their doors.

I'm not saying the article is wrong, but it seems to me that "Hathway" and "Berkshire Hathaway" sound enough alike that an urban legend could be generated, and "it was that Warren Buffett who done it, he bought our factory and just closed the doors, trying to give his Fruit of the Loom company more of the market." Berkshire Hathaway does own Fruit of the Loom, but I don't think the two companies were competing for the same market segment.

I've done some looking, and I can't find anything to substantiate the Berkshire Hathaway villainy. If anyone can find a legitimate source that says that Berkshire Hathaway was involved with C.F. Hathaway at any time, I invite them to share it with the rest of us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.1.99.188 (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Waterville, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Waterville, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Climate data

edit

I will be looking at this soon ... The high proportion of .1's and .9's leads me to believe this data had been shuffled through metric and back again. Direct source should be in Fahrenheit only. Soap 17:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Replaced with fresh link, still online at DRI. The extra sigfigs in the old data could not possibly have been real, since data is not recorded in hundredths of degrees. This means that it was a recycled source, probably in Celsius, and may have been incorrect in any case as some of its values were surprisingly far off of this one's, more what one would expect for a coastal station like Portland. Soap 19:18, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Waterville, Maine

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Waterville, Maine's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "USCensusEst2018":

  • From Westbrook, Maine: "Population and Housing Unit Estimates". Retrieved August 1, 2019.
  • From Aroostook County, Maine: "Population and Housing Unit Estimates". Archived from the original on May 29, 2017. Retrieved July 31, 2019. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 10:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply