This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Over the past few hours, a freshly registered account made a series of edits to this article which were reverted by other editors with warnings on the talk page. More changes, so I've reverted again. There are several issues here:
The edit summary is that the article "highlights less critical information and does not provide details on his most significant contributions, assignments and achievements". On it's face this is a claim of WP:UNDUE however the large volume of changes deserves more than a bland general explanation.
This edit introduced new factual claims without a citation
The user claims to be "contributing based on my discussion with his team and colleagues which are best placed to provide reliable information." On its face, this raises questions of conflict of interest or paid editing. @Clic09bhe do you have a relationship, paid or otherwise, with the article subject? Please familiarize yourself with WP:COI if you have doubts about what this might mean.
The rapid series of edits and reverts raises the possibility of an edit warring conduct violation. I'm not saying that's what it is, but if the edits continue without engagement with other editors that may be where this is headed.
I've put a warning template on the user talk page regarding edit warring. @Clic09bhe I suggest engagement in discussion at this talk page is the appropriate next move.
