Talk:WeRe Bank

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 2600:1700:465B:6410:68E5:4B67:155:4AA1

I don't believe that the notability of a company is in play here, but rather that this is a notable long term scam that several government bodies have deemed notable enough to issue warnings about. It's also an older scam, so I doubt there will be much future coverage and the online accessibility of material may decrease. Legacypac (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

According to reliable sources cited in the article, there is no company or formalized organization (although there are fee-paying "members"). It is described as being run online by one person with a cell phone. I'm not sure if it is even intentionally a scam. He seems to have some affinity with the sovereign citizen movement, freemen on the land and that sort of thing, but the similarities are limited. The notability is on the same basis as those ideas, the redemption movement and so on, so the appropriate guideline is WP:FRINGE. Jack N. Stock (talk) 05:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
I paid five hundred dollars and didn’t receive anything. 2600:1700:465B:6410:68E5:4B67:155:4AA1 (talk) 03:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

I found two court cases that involved people trying to pay off debts with WeRe Bank "checks": in Scotland and in Canada. Jack N. Stock (talk) 05:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nice work on improving this article User:Jacknstock. The Alberta case is just two years old. Legacypac (talk) 06:53, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply