Talk:WeWOOD

Advertisement

See discussion [[1]]. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

You said that the sentences about the woods used are incorrect and I removed them. There is a separate section for planting tree because that's the thing for which they have received most of the media coverage. I have removed the information about the models as well. But I would need something more concrete to work with. Some sentences that aren't right or something.Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk)

ok one of the things I said was "the majority seems to be a little WP:UNDUE details of what woood is used, statements about promotions regarding planting trees, explaining the products how they are made how many models they sell doesn't strike me personally as a nuetral article phrasing." It's an overall tone, please allow another editor to review it nor connected to the article. Sometimes it's a little better because we can't always see the issues with our writing. I would say don't think of it negatively as I mentioned on my talkpage I routinely tag my articles up and copy edit experts come and help fix them. I'm not accusing you of anything bad just saying we need to tweak the articles a little. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Ah! I get it. You might be right. I do feel a little bad that something that I have written is tagged. I know we are not supposed to be possessive about the articles we have created, but it does sort of feel bad when you write something and it's tagged. The thing is, I see so many articles that are tagged and nobody bothers to remove the tags. There are articles tagged since 2007. I would love for you to help me out with this. If you can take a little time and fix it with me. Not necessarily today. Whenever you get time. It's just that whenever an article is tagged, it gets tagged forever. And tagged articles look sort of ugly to me. I won't remove the tag now since I do respect and trust your judgement.Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks and we all feel the same way but when we look at it just a litle different we're in good shape. I will try and set some time aside and make some fixes myself. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WeWOOD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140329093609/http://www.vogue.co.uk/blogs/the-green-style-blog/2011/03/29/wewood-watches-launch-at-eco-age to http://www.vogue.co.uk/blogs/the-green-style-blog/2011/03/29/wewood-watches-launch-at-eco-age
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140329081722/http://www.okmagazine.com.au/view-gallery.htm?index=2&gid=17085 to http://www.okmagazine.com.au/view-gallery.htm?index=2&gid=17085

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)