Talk:We All Want Love/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Calvin999 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 22:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Review

edit
References

Second round

edit

Sorry for the wait. I was a little busy. I have revised everything and nothing needs to be done.

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


Final comment: Good job. It'll be great if an image is added but is not a requirement, so it meets al the criteria. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 00:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh thanks lol. Aaron You Da One 09:59, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.