Talk:We Ride

Latest comment: 4 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in We Ride
Good articleWe Ride has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 4, 2012Good article nomineeListed

For expansion

edit

Album reviews

edit

Calvin Watch n' Learn

Tracklistings/Formats

edit

Calvin Watch n' Learn

Charts

edit

Calvin Watch n' Learn

Music video

edit

Calvin Watch n' Learn

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:We Ride/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs) 00:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I will be reviewing this article. Toa Nidhiki05 00:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  • 1a) Absolutely no grammar errors that need correction - excellent job. It is likely not FA-quality, but is more than adequate for a GA.
  • 1b) Meets all criteria as well.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • Per WP:GACN, all of the above are passed.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • All two of these are clear.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  • I believe this is rather fair.
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  • Not an issue.
  1. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  • I don't see a problem with either of theese.
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • Overall, a nice article with no real problems with GA-criteria. Good job!


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on We Ride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on We Ride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in We Ride

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of We Ride's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "France":

  • From You da One: "Rihanna – You da One (Chanson)" (in French). lescharts.com. Retrieved July 11, 2012.
  • From Loud Tour Live at the O2: France:
  • From SOS (Rihanna song): "Rihanna – SOS (Song)" (in French). lesharts.com. Retrieved December 26, 2011.
  • From Half of Me (Rihanna song): "lescharts.com - Rihanna - Half of Me". Les Charts. Syndicat National de l'Édition Phonographique. Retrieved December 4, 2012.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 01:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply