Wikipedia

Talk:Weather of 2010

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Untitled

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I split it off of Winter storms 2010 since it was a bit big (in kilobites) and it had morphed beond just litraly Winter storms (ie-blizards).--Snow storm in Eastern Asia (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Global storm activity of 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Global storm activity of 2010's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ReferenceA":

  • From Amtrak: Amtrak Schedule valid from May 11, 2009
  • From Winter storms of 2009–2010: "Фото 25 декабря 2009, 12:00. At Weekend Primorye to be Covered with Snow - PrimaMedia. Последние новости Владивостока, Приморский край, Приморье, Дальний Восток". Vladivostoktimes.com. Retrieved 2010-02-26.
  • From Salt: "10+1 Things you may not know about Salt", Epikouria Magazine, Fall/Winter 2006
  • From Norway: "The Judiciary". Norway.org. 2009-06-10. Retrieved 2010-01-27.
  • From Inverness: Highland Profile, The Highland Council.
  • From China: Homer H. Dubs, "Theism and Naturalism in Ancient Chinese Philosophy," Philosophy of East and West, Vol. 9, No. 3/4, 1959
  • From Haiti: Turning Points in History,(Documentary) Episode: "Aristide's Haiti"
  • From Antonio Villaraigosa: KNBC news conference
  • From Jammu and Kashmir: CIA - The World Factbook
  • From Estonia: The History of the Baltic States by Kevin O'Connor ISBN 0-313-32355-0
  • From Dallas: American FactFinder Selected Social Characteristics: 2005-2007 – U.S. Census Bureau
  • From Jordan: See table of data with source referenced and explanation on Talk page – Ethnicity

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Go chew on [[[1]]] bot!--Snow storm in Eastern Asia (talk) 16:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ [[1]]

References

Add "Mexico experiences its record worst ever rainy season." per The China Post and AFP via The Age ... ?

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Add *Mexico experiences its record worst ever rainy season. (The China Post)link (AFP via The Age) ... ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.60.124.160 (talk) 00:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Badly referenced

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Surely each and every claim made in this article should cite a reference? I have a notion to tag EVER claim that does not provide one. Bjmullan (talk) 20:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Are we thinking about the impossible?

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As i have seen, many people complain that the page is badly referenced. To go forward with my opinion, i feel that we have come to a situation where we have to take an immediate action, or see that the next year's page is not like this. In order to fix the current problem, it would take a period of 2 weeks for a human. The work is so complicated and boring (to be honest) that no-one wants to do it. If we have any bot to help us, then let it begin immediately. If the page seems to have grown up to such an extent where editing every line is almost impossible, then forget about the past, think about the future. Plan the future in a way that makes it perfect. Plan the future in a way that this silly problem of references does not grow up into a WikiDisaster. Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:31, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Kilobytes

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

It is 260 kilobytes long. Split it in half?--213.81.117.13 (talk) 17:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC) The 2009 page was 95 long.--213.81.117.13 (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cutting out unreferenced info with reduce the size. Bjmullan (talk) 17:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

All 150 Kb's worth? Cut it between May and June say.--213.81.117.13 (talk) 17:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

260 kb 2010 farce

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The 2010 page is 280 kb long, so I split it.--Wipsenade (talk) 02:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yeh, fine, it was over 3 times the length of it's predisesor.--82.11.94.123 (talk) 02:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I split it off of Winter storms 2010 since it was a bit big (in kilobites) and it had morphed beond just litraly Winter storms (ie-blizards).--Snow storm in Eastern Asia (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.nowpublic.com/world/beijing-snowstorm-paralyzes-chinese-capital-travel-affected
    Triggered by \bnowpublic\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:21, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 16:33, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re-split

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The second part was also filling up fast, so i slit it into two making three parts now. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 09:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you.--Wipsenade (talk) 10:35, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions

This splitting, re-splitting and re-merging of the yearly global storm articles is starting to become problematic where it is difficult to keep track of all the content, contributions and references. I suggest simply having a set of two articles per year: one for the summer storms and one for the winter storms, then split that into two or three if necessary (but don't have 2 summer articles and 3 winter articles nor vice versa). IMHO entries for dust storms, tropical cyclones, non-unusual seasonal monsoon rains causing no major damage, minor dustings of snow except where extremely unusual, non-precipitation heat and cold waves, fire storms and very minor events should generally not be included in any of these articles (unless the occurrences are significant and there is nowhere else in articles to put them). There are plenty of things that need to be cleaned up in practically all of these articles, and I will participate in this process soon. It is preferable to have specific articles on the storms, but create one only when necessary, as many of them are already becoming outdated. The scope of the articles should primarily focus on weather bombs, widespread deadly snowstorms, extratropical lows, windstorms, ice storms, etc. for the winter, and severe flooding events, sudden downpours or flash floods, landslides, hailstorms, tornadoes, etc. for the summer. Please fix the broken and bare URLs in our cite tags, and clean up the casualty table and place it at the bottom. Keep the see also section in a separate section, and remove any irrelavent links while maintaining a surplus of useful links. Please do not simply copy the list from article to article, as this creates for example links to past northern hemisphere winters in articles about northern hemisphere summers and southern winters. Introductions equivalent to "snow is weather" should be kept to a minimum, while a summary of the major storms should be provided once the article is in better shape. Red links, meanwhile, should be changed to more direct links or removed where void. Do not overlink to articles such as "snow" and names of non-notable people, and avoid potentially misleading language. To-do lists on individual articles may also help, but only when there is little risk that they will be moved or split further. Include any relevant images of the actual storms to the side. These are some of the things that could be done to improve the article quality for the annual storm articles. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 02:42, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Problem post deletion

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The main problem with the article is that it doesn't quantify anything. "Storm activity" should not include droughts or heat waves. In addition, the first sentence says it includes "major" meteorological events, and yet there is so much trivia in there that it's hard to tell what is important or not.

  • A major dust storm hits New Dehli, India, on May 6, 2010
    • The source says nothing about the dust storm being major
  • On May 27, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Weather Service forecast a "below normal" rating for hurricane season in the Eastern Pacific in 2010. The season runs from May 15 to May 30, and the eastern Pacific usually has about 15 storms, according to the American agency.
    • How is that "activity"?
  • On May 30, light thunder storms hit parts of Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire as temperatures begin to rise in Southern England and Greater London.
    • How is that major?

The article often re-mentions previous storms, often with much redundant information. For example, the coverage on Tropical Storm Agatha (2010) is mentioned in five paragraphs. The biggest problem is that by saying "major" in the lede, there is no way to quantify that, since it's extremely subjective. What's major in the United States (a flood killing 20 people in a major city) would not be major in a poorly-developed country, for the very reason that identical storms would cause much less damage in a better developed country (due to proper flood controls, whatnot). There are very few record storms mentioned here that I can see, which would be a useful quantifier ("List of weather records (2010)" being a plausible title). It honestly seems like majority of the article is in violation of WP:NOTNEWS, and so much of what is included is simply a recap of that week's severe weather. This is a good example of that.

I think another AfD might be needed. Does anyone have any thoughts? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I echo Hurricanehinks concerns especially as i personally feel that the article contains an unacceptable amount of trivia.Jason Rees (talk) 22:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles recombined

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In case you guys didn't know, the third article was deleted and never re-created. Due to the fact that the articles aren't as long as a couple of major articles I have visited, and the fact that a single article makes all of the information much easier to locate for readers and editors alike, I have recombined all of the articles and their respective talk pages into a single article. LightandDark2000 (talk) 12:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 11 external links on Global storm activity of 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 10 external links on Global storm activity of 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Global storm activity of 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Global storm activity of 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Global storm activity of 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 36 external links on Global storm activity of 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Global storm activity of 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Global storm activity of 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Weather_of_2010&oldid=1226110331"