Talk:Weaving a Story/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 18:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Lead and plot seem fine

Production

• To whom was the project published?
• Maybe mentioning Weaving a Story's title could be fitting for the first paragraph.

Reception

• Everything seems fine but was this the lowest rating so far or there was another one?

The lowest of the lowest!

That's all.Tintor2 (talk) 18:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Okay, then. Done!--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Will be reviewing this article.Tintor2 (talk) 18:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)