This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graphic design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Graphic designWikipedia:WikiProject Graphic designTemplate:WikiProject Graphic designGraphic design articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This page has a lot of potential considering the growing presence of the web in the world. One of the references in this article doesn’t work and the other is out of date by 6 years now, so it would benefit the article to update its information to pertain to 2016. There is a lot written about the topic of web content development, especially in the context of writing for the web, that would be helpful in further developing this article. It would also be useful to talk more about audiences as they are the ones that content developers are targeting on the web. Parts of this article seem to be biased with some undertones of cynicism towards technology and content developers as can be seen through the use of words like “manipulating.” In terms of the structure, I think it would be good for each section mentioned in the lead (researching, writing, organizing, etc.) to have its own heading and to be discussed more in depth. Overall I think the article has incredible potential, it just needs more updated and relevant content. Buggzy641 (talk) 21:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
