Talk:Wedding

Copyright problem removed

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: numerous sources including https://www.deseret.com/2018/12/2/20794441/5-special-occasions-when-you-should-wear-white, https://historyofyesterday.com/a-brief-history-of-the-white-wedding-dress-80ac81b1a113, http://www.color-wheel-pro.com/color-meaning.html, https://theconversation.com/why-do-brides-wear-white-14439, etc. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 07:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Then again, any original content that a contributor writes in an article is copyrighted, also. The copyright is owned by the person who wrote the content. So how now, brown cow? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:B078:6C00:BC5E:52A2:89F8:E1EA (talk) 22:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

English

Heritage Issigment ..explain about traditional ceremonies 41.115.2.27 (talk) 10:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Wedding

Wedding — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.77.19.23 (talk) 17:25, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

@41.77.19.23 hi, i have given an external resource for the page but m not able able to see can you please sharw your valuable feedback, i have given wedding tips blog for a reference link... Bharatnegiseo (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Why do some people get married in group ceremonies

It’s 37.237.180.14 (talk) 14:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Ah nvm. Answered.

Central premise wrong

The approach of this article is entirely wrong in that it focuses exclusively on one portion of a wedding (the marriage ritual), and as a result fails to provide a full treatment of the subject. The current approach reduces all of the ancillary trappings of a wedding to tangents, and makes it impossible to truly take an inclusive, inter-cultural approach to the subject, because all of those various trappings found in different cultures become largely off topic.

The article should be restructured to present weddings as a broad event that may (not always) include a ceremony or other ritual (though not necessarily), along with other celebratory features, such as a feast and a dance party. This would then establish a structured and organized opportunity to present practices and traditions from different cultures as being of equal importance to the subject matter. As it stands, the article's approach can only be considered valid when viewing the subject through an ego-centric lens that posits one cultural background as having greater importance than others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:B078:6C00:E9F1:D5CD:7A3B:BBF (talk) 21:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC)