Talk:Weightlessness
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Micro-g environment page were merged into Weightlessness on 29 April 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Illustrations
editWhile there is a need for illustrations, some of the ones in this article have minimal educational value. Perhaps they were intended to be GIF's with motion, but "a block of lead in free fall above planet X" -- really? I suggest this article be downgraded to "C" status until better illustrated and written. GeeBee60 (talk) 18:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Rewrite or merge
editThis article needs some expertiese and a writer who communicates rather than pontificates. I made some edits to the lede, but as it was written and still is written, it mostly ignores the content of the article, which has everything from Newton's apple to the pitfalls of weightlessness aboard space stations. Some topic titles border on silly, such as "How to avoid weightlessness", with unrelated discussion. And as noted in my earlier post, some drawings are weak and unhelpful.
One problem is that debating weightlessness is like debating fire. Fire is both a chemical reaction and a visceral experience. And we require it in some form, and we take it for granted. Same with gravity and weight. For us earthbound humans, weightlessness is a temporary physical sensation, from a few seconds to, for an extremely small number, a few months.
Obviously it is also an academic exercise, but aspects of the debate resemble some "what if" reveries. Lets keep it real and grounded, folk. An earlier suggestion by User:SarahTehCat was to merge this article with Micro-g environment. Most of materials could be deleted in the merge, along with a redirect. Micro-g is a much-superior, though longer and broader, article. --GeeBee60 (talk) 01:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- I did some cleanup per MOS: and WP:NPOV. —Yours sincerely, Soumyabrata (contributions • subpages) 10:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- Four years later and this still needs to be addressed. Agree that the Micro-g environment article is better and support a merge. I'll see what I can do to facilitate the merge. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 21:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Merge proposal is live at Talk:Micro-g_environment#Merger_proposal. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 22:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Physics
editwhat is weightlessness 157.33.79.9 (talk) 15:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Ambiguity with microgravity
editIt should be clearly stated that microgravity on the ISS for instance is NOT related to absence of gravity. It's a misused term. On the ISS the earth gravity is almost ALL there. If there was no gravity there would be NO orbiting. 87.27.134.42 (talk) 12:46, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Ambiguity on microgravity
editIt should be clearly stated that microgravity on the ISS for instance is NOT related to absence of gravity. It's a misused term. On the ISS the earth gravity is almost ALL there. If there was no gravity there would be NO orbiting. The freefall condition that ALL orbiting objects experience is not clearly explained.