Talk:Weights and Measures Act
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Earlier editing history
editfor some of this material at Weights and Measures Acts (UK). Kindly maintain it with the citations until there are new pages for Ireland, &c., where this material can be placed. Kindly do not blank it by overzealous misunderstanding of generic dab policy. — LlywelynII 05:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- It is not a disambig in any event; it is a list of things of the same type, and therefore an SIA. bd2412 T 14:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Weights and Measures Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111205014637/http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/upload/stlaw.pdf to http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/upload/stlaw.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)