Talk:Westfield London

Untitled

what about the cinemas

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Pals!!!!! I'm abdullah you guys celebtate ramadan 2607:FEA8:A5E:9E00:5CA9:818A:86AF:3DBC (talk) 15:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:The Westfield Group logo.svg

The image Image:The Westfield Group logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Inconsistencies in Article

How can Westfield London be the biggest indoor shopping centre in Europe, but only the third largest shopping centre in the UK (behind Metrocentre and Bluewater, both of which are indoor)? Bear in mind also, that there is a shopping centre in Turkey larger than Metrocentre, hence now Metrocentre only being the biggest shopping centre in the European Union. Preceding drivel from §©ʁİƃƀȴıŋ’ Ƨł₥ȫȠ ^{talk|contribs} 12:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

This seems to be a claim that is continually being added to the article by anonymous users Pit-yacker (talk) 01:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Needed a qualification - largest in-town shopping centre, as distinct from the out-of-town ones. The article now reflects this, with references to the claim.Cnbrb (talk) 10:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

However, thecentre:mk is also an in-town shopping centre, although estimates of its retail floorspace vary widely and are complicated by small recent extensions and conversions of storage space etc. into retail Aboodoo (talk) 22:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Criticisms

I think in the interests of impartiality and encyclopedic treatment this article should also include some of the criticisms of and bad press associated with the development. Any contributions welcome... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.133.150.142 (talk) 10:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Ethnic Balance on Thursday Evenings

For some reason it appears that the ethnic make up is majority black on Thursday evenings. Most of these are "wannabe-gangsta" youths with jeans so low their underwear shows, and baseball caps. One that I saw was wearing gloves, perhaps so fingerprints wouldn't be left behind? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.216.135.212 (talk) 21:14, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

There's a large council estate nearby, with a significant black population, and Harlesden (mainly black) is only 2 miles away. Perhaps the local yoof have decided to make Thursday evenings their night to hang out in Westfield. I work in the area. They're no different to any other inner-city teenagers. Some bad eggs who steal bikes and worse, but mainly aimiable. Isn't it great that there's a really nice shopping centre, with juice bars, etc, and soon a cinema, for them to meet up in, rather than playing video games on their own, or sneaking round drinking illegally in back alleys!

They wear yoof fashions. They think they look good. Some of them even have underpants which are worth showing off. Many of them like window shopping, even if they then go away and buy things cheaper over the internet. By the way, my 89 year old aunt, who died a few weeks ago, also often wore gloves when going out. She did it not to avoid leaving fingerprints, but to keep her hands clean and because she felt it looked smart. I believe Michael Jackson did it for the same reasons. I expect the lad you saw wearing them copied MJ rather than my aunt. Enginear (talk) 01:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Other development projects?

The 2nd para of the article states "The site is part of the White City district, where several other large scale development projects are under way or in the planning stages." I work nearby, and have not noticed any developments in progress. Nor am I aware of any submitted for Planning Consent, although there may well be some. Also, nothing is mentioned about this in White City. Enginear (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

A casual look up the road shows that the area to the north has many empty buildings, which are probably awaiting a favourable development climate, and of course Television Centre may be developed in the future, although certainly not soon.

But if anyone knows of more advanced plans, I would be very interested to read about them. To a casual user, Westfield appears to be thriving, so no doubt the area will change...but in what way? Enginear (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Prior use of site

2nd para of article states "The development is on a large brownfield site which was once the location of the 1908 Franco-British Exhibition; the initial site clearance demolished the final set of halls still remaining from the exhibition."

That is partially true. Other areas included the old Central Line rail depot (now relocated at a lower level, below the development, while remaining operational throughout -- one of the reasons the development took 5 yrs to build!) and the old bus station. I'll add a note about the former.

Also of interest, a wartime munitions factory was located on (or possibly just north of) the site. Recent minor building works at an office block nearby caused at least 2 visits by the bomb squad to make safe/remove munitions (I believe WW1 vintage) which had been buried! The relevance to the Westfield works was that, during WW2, the factory was a major target and it was considered likely that several unexploded bombs would be found during the major excavations required for piling and for burying the rail depot. RAF photos of bomb damage showed regular lines of bomb craters...with an occasional gap, which would normally indicate a bomb which had not exploded and might remain buried. In fact, as far as I know, none were found, but local businesses, and possibly residents, from Television Centre to Shepherd's Bush Green had anti-shatter film put on their windows to avoid injury in case of unexpected explosion.

Unfortunately, I do not have adequate quality of information on this (eg exactly where was the factory; was it used in both wars, and if not, why were WW1 munitions found when the bombing was definitely WW2 (the bomb squad mentioned 500 lb or even perhaps one 1000 lb bomb!) etc. But if anyone has good info, it is worthy of inclusion somewhere on the Wiki, maybe even here. Enginear (talk) 00:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Westfield London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080921230556/http://www.tfl.gov.uk:80/corporate/projectsandschemes/9337.aspx to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/projectsandschemes/9337.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Westfield London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081102131509/http://westfield.com/corporate/news-announcements/media-releases/2008/20081030_12394.html to http://westfield.com/corporate/news-announcements/media-releases/2008/20081030_12394.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090319024733/http://westfield.com/corporate/pdf/presentations/WDC_March_Quarter_8May2007.pdf to http://westfield.com/corporate/pdf/presentations/WDC_March_Quarter_8May2007.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090319024729/http://westfield.com/corporate/pdf/presentations/ASX_RELEASE_Presentation%26Appendix4D_27Aug08.pdf to http://westfield.com/corporate/pdf/presentations/ASX_RELEASE_Presentation%26Appendix4D_27Aug08.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC)