Talk:Westminster paedophile dossier

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pedophilia Article Watch (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Pedophilia Article WatchWikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchTemplate:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchPedophilia Article Watch articles

United Kingdom: Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This page is under the stewardship of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom.

New development

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This may be of interest. Mjroots (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

IPCC investigation

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Material on yesterday's news story has been added by myself at Elm Guest House child abuse scandal, and by JezGrove in this article. I don't think that's a problem in itself, but we will need to make sure that the articles are consistent with each other in what they say - unless people think there is a case for restructuring (not merging) the articles, or creating a new one based around the latest inquiries. Any thoughts? Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic