Talk:Wet Lubricants

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Elvey in topic Pop Culture References = spam?

Pop Culture References = spam?

edit

This section seems questionable to me. I'm challenging it. Brand names generally don't appear on major TV shows unless product placement fees have been paid. So 'Product Placements' seems like a more appropriate title, and a section on Product Placements just doesn't seem encyclopedic to me. Thoughts on deleting this section?--Elvey(t•c) 20:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

510k Approval

edit

The citation for being a medical device manufacturer should be replaced with a publicly accessible reference rather than the .gov website currently listed. Upon following the citation, the reader is asked for a username and password. There are other ways of showing that the company/brand is FDA approved. Example: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPMN/pmn.cfm?ID=K013086. I am not sure of it, but I believe this website shows that the manufacturer, Trigg Laboratories Inc. is FDA 510k approved.

--Lumpy Berserk; July 1st, 2017