This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Haven't reviewed an article of yours in a while after you did spend a good amount of time away from Wiki and I will happily take this one on now! --K. Peake17:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
"The song's production was" → "Its production was"
"It was released as the fifth single" → "The song was released as the fifth and final single" with the target, plus there should be a full-stop before this to end the previous sentence
The R&B track part should have "musically" removed and come before the sample info instead, plus change that to ""What You Know Bout" samples" with the target
Retitle to Reception because there are accolades at the end
"the song shows that Pop Smoke" → "the song shows Pop Smoke"
"into multiple genres"." → "into multiple genres."" for consistency
"big to contain"." → "big to contain.""
"along with the album tracks" → "along with fellow album tracks" to be more specific
"even sometimes tender"." → "even sometimes tender.""
"In their album review," → "In her album review," because "their" implies it is the publication's staff or any other group/person who the genre of is unknown
The last two reviews should be in the first para instead since the second should only be for the two accolades; this number is not enough for a sub-section
"the song strayed Pop Smoke from his" → "the song strays from Pop Smoke's"
"It rose to number nine" → "The song climbed to number nine"
Cite Pop Smoke's chart history at the end of this sentence instead, as that verifies it being his third top 10 hit
"later rose to number 4" → "later rose to number four" and you should cite the chart from the table by using a ref name here instead, to avoid repeated refs
"The single peaked at number 16" → ""What You Know Bout Love" peaked at number 16"
Top five info should come before top 10 since not only are the positions higher, but the top five mentions New Zealand's fellow Oceania country Australia
Remove ref 30 per my earlier comment; it is basically a duplicate of the chart table's ref, to elaborate
You can replace ref 33 with ref 34, as they are the same and the former is cited from a URL not a template so a ref name can be used to replace it anywhere
On hold for a week since I know you are somewhat busy with other ventures currently; I have noticed that your skills as an editor have approved by a considerable amount though! --K. Peake08:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
The Ultimate Boss I fixed the reference for you and added its status as a dead URL, plus thank you for implementing the suggested changes even though I did some copy editing in the lead where my suggestions seem to have come across as confusing to you. ✓Pass and I did remember to fix the target for music critics as well! --K. Peake17:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply