Talk:What a Beautiful Name
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Lionelt in topic Chart Performance - referencing
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the What a Beautiful Name article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from What a Beautiful Name appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 January 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Chart Performance - referencing
editDon't know why you don't see the source material at Asker. All of the disputed text in the para is referenced to Asker. The reference is #[3], at the end of the para. For relevant policy see WP:CITENEED#When not to use this tag, bullet 7 . Here is a table comparing the text that you are disputing and the original source text from the source, which is Asker.
| Disputed text | Quote from source | Source |
|---|---|---|
| "What a Beautiful Name" is ranked as the No. 1 song of the year for 2017 on the Christian Digital Sales chart | "Concurrently, "Name" is the No. 1 song for 2017 on Christian Digital Song Sales" | Jim Asker, Billboard |
| No. 3 on Christian Streaming Songs | "No. 3 on Christian Streaming Songs" | Jim Asker, Billboard |
| the No. 3 song on Christian Airplay | "No. 3 song of the year on Christian Airplay" | Jim Asker, Billboard |
| The song spent nine weeks as No. 1 on Christian Airplay | '"Name" ruled Christian Airplay for nine weeks' | Jim Asker, Billboard |
As you can see the para is fully referenced. Please do not re-add the tags. If you have any further questions let's discuss on talk.– Lionel(talk) 03:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think I see the problem. There are two sources by Asker: [1][2], which I did not realize until now. The former is the one the one in the reference, but the first one in the references section is the latter provided here. Self-reverting. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- You do great work at this project. I'm a fan :-) – Lionel(talk) 06:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)