Talk:Whatever Will Be (song)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Whatever Will Be (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
I thought a single could only go Gold if it had sold over 35,000 copies as the ARIA<(The official australian music chart) said [http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-accreditations.htm. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hollabackben (talk • contribs) 06:19, 18 March 2006.
A single is accredited by it's shipped copies, Sony comfirmed that they shipped over 35,000 copies giving it a gold accreditation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Harry** (talk • contribs) 04:06, 25 March 2006.
OK, but why does it say it sold +28,000 Copies? If it sold 35,000+? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lillygirl (talk • contribs) 06:11, 25 March 2006.
It didn't sell over 35,000 copies but they sent out over 35,000 copies —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.129.54.17 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 26 March 2006.
Record companies always send out more copies than sold and since it was following a platinum single, they thought it would sell more. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Harry** (talk • contribs) 10:10, 26 March 2006.
If it didn't sell over 35,000 copies then it can not go gold. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 143.238.219.184 (talk • contribs) 11:45, 26 March 2006.
Yes it can because accreditations are based on how many copies are sent out not sold. Read this: http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-faqs.htm#q3 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.129.54.17 (talk • contribs) 09:38, 27 March 2006.
Fair use rationale for Image:WWBS.jpg
edit
Image:WWBS.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
#c-BetacommandBot-2008-02-12T03:15:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:WWBS.jpg){kind=link}