Talk:Whatever the Case May Be
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Whatever the Case May Be article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
editRequested move for:
- Live Together, Die Alone (Lost) → Live Together, Die Alone
- The Glass Ballerina (Lost) → The Glass Ballerina
- Whatever the Case May Be (Lost) → Whatever the Case May Be
Discuss/vote here --`/aksha 03:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. -- nae'blis 20:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:LOST112.jpg
editImage:LOST112.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Sources
edit@Ruby2010: Just pinging you in case you're interested in working on this episode— totally ok if you don't want to. Thanks for all of the work so far :)-Newyorkadam (talk) 17:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Newyorkadam
Vox interview with Damon Lindelof
Lostpedia claims that "This episode marked the departure of J.J. Abrams from showrunning input, to work on Mission Impossible III."— find a source
According to Lostpedia, "The behind-the-scenes reason for the "unusual tides" that are about to submerge the fuselage was that actual seasonal tides on the North shore of Oahu would have eventually flooded the shooting site for real, thereby submerging the fuselage set and causing an ecological disaster. Therefore, an in-story reason had to be found for the survivors moving their camp to a different location. (Hearts and Minds audio commentary)"— Check into this.
-Newyorkadam (talk) 17:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Newyorkadam
Oh yeah, also, this article (and Lostpedia) claim that "The New York Times cited this episode as 'a breath of fresh air' when comparing it to the previous few", but I can't find this anywhere. Look into this. -Newyorkadam (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Newyorkadam