Talk:Wheelie and the Chopper Bunch

Wheelie and the Chopper Bunch has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 12, 2017. (Reviewed version).

Animation: American / Hanna-Barbera Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Hanna-Barbera work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 7 years ago12 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wheelie and the Chopper Bunch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Argento Surfer (talk · contribs) 15:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

It may take three days for me to complete my initial review (I am unable to edit on weekends). I will note/pass items as I go along. You don't need to wait for me to finish to begin addressing them. Most of my comments are open for discussion, so feel free to question anything. Once complete, I will be claiming points for this review in the 2017 WikiCup. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Premise
"a land full of automobiles" I think sentient (or a synonym) should be added in front of automobiles for clarity.

I think Cycle World should be linked in the prose.

Characters
Why is this section arranged by voice actor instead of character? I think it would be more effective in the opposite order. As is, the protagonist and antagonist are currently lumped into the same bullet point.
Done – I did some "flip-flopping" and separated the protagonist and antagonist. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC).Reply

Per WP:PROTAGONIST, Wheelie should be described as the lead or star, not the protagonist.
Done – I used "lead" instead of "protagonist". Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC).Reply

Production
"Wheelie and the Chopper Bunch premiered nearly one year after the debut of Speed Buggy in 1973" - suggest "Wheelie and the Chopper Bunch premiered in 1973, nearly one year after the debut of Speed Buggy, another Hanna-Barbera cartoon with similar themes.
Done – Took your suggestion. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC).Reply

I suggest relocating the Broadcast subsection from reception to production and locating it between the current paragraphs. This is in line with FA article Ed, Edd n Eddy and clarifies that it was still being aired when Bryne's comic was commissioned.
Done – Relocated the section and added appropriate sub-titles. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC).Reply

" his first "full issue" series of comic books" - what does "full issue" mean? That he did art for the full issue? That he did pencils and inks? Pencils, inks, and scripting?
Done – Removed "full issue" because I believe the sentence (as it is) gives the same effect. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC).Reply

I think it's worth mentioning the comics were published by Charlton Comics.
Done – Added. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC).Reply

"According to Byrne himself, he also felt... " - I think "Byrne also said he felt..." reads more smoothly.
Done – Took your suggestion. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC).Reply

Episodes
no concerns

Reception
no concerns

Lead
no concerns

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
no concern
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
no concern

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
no concern

C. It contains no original research:
no concerns

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Ear wig results are for common phrases like the title. No concern
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
no concerns

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
no concerns
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
no concerns
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
no ongoing conflicts or vandalism.
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
no concern

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
no concern
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pass pending responses to concerns listed above. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Argento Surfer – Thank you so much for the review! I changed the article accordingly and left you some comments above. Please let me know if you need any additional information from me. Regards, Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC).Reply
Nice work. Easy pass. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Jellystone!

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In which episode(s) do Wheelie, Rota Ree, and the Chopper Bunch appear in Jellystone?2600:6C5A:417F:794E:BD2D:FA34:E85A:CAD6 (talk) 02:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic