Talk:Whippet (bus company)

File:Go Whippet logo.PNG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Go Whippet logo.PNG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 11 December 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved per WP:COMMONNAME. (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 21:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

---

Go Whippet → Whippet Coaches – Whippet has now stopped using the name "Go Whippet", and uses "Whippet" or "Whippet Coaches" on all its latest products and mentions on official websites, including its own ( http://www.go-whippet.co.uk/ ) . The company's twitter feed, although retaining the old 'gowhippet' username, for its full name uses 'Whippet Coaches' ( https://twitter.com/GoWhippet )- so I propose this page is renamed back to the original and the redirect is removed. Whistler (talk) 17:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose. And removing the redirect is a particularly bad idea and completely contrary to practice and policy. But the changes in official name have no direct relevance in terms of article title policy, and the story of this particular naming yo-yo is an excellent example of one reason why we have this policy. Let the dust settle and when it does, see what the common name ends up being. And keep the redirect, either way. Andrewa (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Go Whippet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120921034904/http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Cambridge/Operators-hit-out-at-costly-hold-ups-to-guided-busway.htm to http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/cn_news_cambridge/displayarticle.asp?id=480712

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)