Talk:White-eyed river martin
 | White-eyed river martin is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
 | White-eyed river martin is part of the River martin series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 31, 2021. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Successful good article nomination
editI am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 4, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Check
- 2. Factually accurate?: Check
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Check
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Check
- 5. Article stability? Check
- 6. Images?: Check
Well written. Nothing to say, quite excellent in my opinion. :) If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. Rt. 15:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Legal status
editThe article already mentions that the species is protected under the CITES Appendix 1. This is locally applied through its designation as a reserved wild animal species.[1] under the Wild Animal Reservation and Protection Act, BE 2535.[2] This could be mentioned in the article. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Photo
editI've uploaded a photo I took of one of the specimens at Chulalongkorn University. I'll leave it to the article's regular contributors to decide how best it should be used. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, Paul, I didn't expect ever to get an image of the actual bird Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Edit summary
editShyamal, no, just my stupidity. Not picked up at FAC either... Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, knowing your careful editing, I was worried that I might have been in error. Shyamal (talk) 05:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Main drawing
editThis stylised drawing of the bird is very inappropriate as the main illustration of this bird. Is there no scientific drawing/accurate drawing, or clear photo that can be used? The stylised drawing is more like a logo. 81.147.167.25 (talk) 08:45, 31 July 2021 (UTC)