This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
[Untitled]
editThis article should be merged into Joe Boyd. (comment by User:76.22.20.146)
- The book has a wealth of historical detail which, if summarized, would absolutely merit it's own article. As it stands it's PR fluff. I would agree. Wwwhatsup (talk) 08:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)