Talk:White Fox (disambiguation)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by JHunterJ in topic Requested move 26 May 2019
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move 26 May 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved and White fox redirected to Arctic fox with a new hatnote placed on that article. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
White fox → White Fox (disambiguation) – White Fox and White fox look very similar. Masum Reza📞 11:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support since all entries named "White Fox" are capitalised. PC78 (talk) 18:47, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support per WP:DABNAME, but then leave White fox redirecting to White Fox (disambiguation). It should not redirect to White Fox (company). -- Netoholic @ 20:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe there's a case for White fox as a primary redirect to Arctic fox? PC78 (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Quite likely - white fox is a common name for that species[1]. -- Netoholic @ 21:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Netoholic: May I ask why? Masum Reza📞 21:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- My main concern is that you've been editing the White Fox (company) article, and so this move seems like a precursor to redirecting white fox to it. All I'm saying is that, if that's the intent behind this move request, it shouldn't happen. -- Netoholic @ 21:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe there's a case for White fox as a primary redirect to Arctic fox? PC78 (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.