Talk:Who's That Chick?/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs) 01:21, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this article. Toa Nidhiki05 01:21, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Preliminary checks look great. The article has no real glaring issues and passes most criteria easily. I will do a full check on prose and citations soon but I have little doubt this will pass.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Manual of style is complied to in all applicable areas, passing 1b. Will do a full check for 1a soon.

"In an interview with Akshay Bhansali for MTV News, Guetta explained that the song was originally intended for inclusion on Rihanna's fifth studio album, Loud (2010), but that he decided to include it on the re-release of his own album, One Love (2009)" add the bolded part.

 Done Aaron • ^{You Da One} 12:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   2a and 2c are both fine. Will check with 2b later.

2b appears fine.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutrality is excellent.

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No edit wars.

4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I'm not sure the five-second audio sample is needed as it is so short but it isn't an issue at the moment. All images have suitable free media tags on them.

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Passing. Great work!

Oh cool thanks! Aaron • ^{You Da One} 15:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)