Talk:Who Can See It/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Paul MacDermott (talk · contribs) 19:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Review by Paul MacDermott

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   Article is laid out fairly well and the prose is reasonably well written. At one paragraph the lead is a little short, but it does cover the issues discussed in the main body of the text as a lead should. One small suggestion I have is that although they appear again later, you might want to attribute the quotes to the authors in the lead as well as later. I see some lyrics are quoted, which WP:LYRICS appears to suggest is fine when they're being discussed in the context of the song.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   Lots of references and inline citations throughout to verify the work. No original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   The article is broad in its coverage, discussing the major topics in relevant detail.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   No issues regarding bias. The article covers the topic in a neutral style.

5. It is stable.

   Article has one major contributor. No issues regarding edit wars or content dispute.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   No images at present. While this is not a problem for GA, it would need some images if you plan to take this forward as an FAC nomination. A couple of ideas might be an image of the record sleeve, and perhaps one of Harrison performing the song at a concert somewhere. Also you might like to consider adding an audio sample of the song for those unfamiliar with it.

7. Overall:

   Pass A good article into which a lot of work has gone. I would recommend expanding the lead, adding some images and perhaps asking for a copyedit if you want to take this to FAC at some future point, but this is fine for GA. Congratulations. Paul MacDermott (talk) 20:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks, Paul MacDermott. I'll definitely take a look again at the lead-in, as you suggest. Cheers, JG66 (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)