This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I don't think I modeled this correctly. I am attempting to fix it to meet Wikipedia's standards now. Aside from that, I wouldn't understand why else this would get denied...? The website has the reputable references and has become very popular. Please tell me what else is missing here.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Loganlenz (talk • contribs)
My apologies, I misread the article title and ended up searching Google for coverage on "whocaniUSE.com", and as the references weren't formatted properly when I reviewed the page I wasn't aware the website was featured in Time mag. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 18:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply