Talk:WhopperCoin/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 17:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Basic stuff and comments

• Lead should summarize the entire article so try expanding it.

• Y Done. jp×g 20:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

• "June of that year" - of which year?

• Y Done. jp×g 20:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

• "on 24 August" - of what year?

• Y Done. jp×g 20:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

• Couldn't find any issues in #Impact.
• Wired → Wired

• Y Done. jp×g 19:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

References

• Archive sources (either manually or with this tool).

• Y Done on March 14. jp×g 19:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

• Mark references from Fortune with "|url-access=subscription".

• Y Done. jp×g 19:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

• Mark references from Adweek with "|url-access=subscription".

• Y Done. jp×g 19:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

• Mark references from New York Magazine with "|url-access=limited".

• Y Done. jp×g 19:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

• @Some Dude From North Carolina: Problems have been addressed, what do you think of it now? jp×g 20:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)