Talk:Why I Love You (Jay-Z and Kanye West song)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review
Why I Love You (Jay-Z and Kanye West song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Why I Love You (Jay-Z and Kanye West song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 21:42, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
edit- No source in article to support that genre is "Alternative hip hop"
Lead
edit- No issues
Background
edit- Fix disambiguation issue with "Mike Dean" according to this
Composition
edit- According to WP:SAMPLE, audio recordings have to be 10% or less than the original recording (it needs to be 20.1 seconds or less and is currently 23 seconds)
Reception
edit- Create a "Chart performance" section that explains debuts, peaks, and weeks on chart to support information in "Charts" section
Charts
edit- No issues
References
edit- Reference 7 → "Rolling Stone" and "Wenner Media" should not be wiki-linked
- Reference 8 → "Pitchfork Media" should not be wiki-linked
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to address these issues and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 23:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)