Talk:Wiebo Ludwig

Terrorist or eco-terrorist?

There's a big difference between a terrorist and an eco-terrorist...one vandalizes, the other causes widespread loss of life. I'm removing the label of terrorist category - I can't find a Saboteur category, but if I come across it later, I'll come back here to update this Sherurcij 17:17, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

Church membership?

I don't believe Wiebo Ludwig is a member of any recognized church in Canada. He used to be a pastor in the Christian Reformed Church of North America, but not any more. Imarsman (talk) 18:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Location?

Where in Alberta does this guy live? My understanding is near Grande Prairie. Should we put this in the article.

Tydoni (talk) 01:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Religious commune?

Do we have a verifiable source describing Ludwig's property as a "religious commune"? I've heard it described variously as a "compound" and a "farm", but not (to my recollection) anything so cultish-sounding. Of course it's been called that or worse in casual speech, but I'm talking about verifiable sources. --Saforrest (talk) 22:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

• "1985 Establishes a religious commune, Trickle Creek, just outside Hythe, Alta."[1].
• "the eccentric head of a religious commune"[2]
• So, it seems that this claim is sourced. But, it's very poor sourcing. The nationalpost.com one is in the "blog" area. I remove the term, but I also don't like "compound" by itself. We need to reword this. --Rob (talk) 07:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

RCMP Bomb Attack Framing Ludwig

In reference to [this article] and [this article] I think there are updates required. Squeezing these, and few other sources for information, I'll make some tentative changes in a little while, and let's see what we think.

Mr.troughton (talk) 03:31, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Wiebo Ludwig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050806074457/http://www.saboteursandbigoil.com/saboteurs.htm to http://www.saboteursandbigoil.com/saboteurs.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717135000/http://www.news1130.com/news/local/article/15094--arrest-made-in-connection-with-encana-pipeline-bombings to http://www.news1130.com/news/local/article/15094--arrest-made-in-connection-with-encana-pipeline-bombings
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100114233059/http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/1999/01/30/sabotage990130.html to http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/1999/01/30/sabotage990130.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050806074457/http://www.saboteursandbigoil.com/saboteurs.htm to http://www.saboteursandbigoil.com/saboteurs.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050301171422/http://tv.cbc.ca/national/pgminfo/ludwig/ to http://www.tv.cbc.ca/national/pgminfo/ludwig/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

New religious movement?

Why is this article in the category "Christian new religious movement"? To my knowledge Ludwig's did not create any kind of new religious movement and did not advocate religious views any different from those of the Dutch Reformed Church.Bill (talk) 07:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Boonstra

The article says "On 11 February 2000, 18 charges were laid against Ludwig and Boonstra." But this is the first mention of Boonstra. Nowhere does it say who Boonstra is. 216.154.23.24 (talk) 02:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)