 | A fact from Wiggins v. Smith appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Style
editI'm not sure what the current style guidelines are for court case articles, but to my ears the article sounds very formal and stilted, with a lot of "counsel" and "defendant". Very apropos for legal briefs/specialist writing, but it sounds very stuffy for a general encyclopedia, in my opinion. That said, once the article disappears from the main page, I doubt that non-legally-inclined people (such as myself) will visit the page with any frequency, so a specialist tone may indeed be appropriate. Just something to think about. -- 19:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Guidelines
editI don't know what the guidelines are. There are not many good articles to imitate. Here is a few I can find. Some are enormously long but I cannot, at the moment, find one of those.
- Gideon v. Wainwright
- Hill v. McDonough
- Miranda v. Arizona
- Powell v. Alabama
- Strickland v. Washington
In any case, the article is about mental health law and is meant for reference to articles of interest to forensic psychology, such as competency evaluation, including competency to be executed, mitigating factors, etc. so they are probably not of much interest to attorneys. These cases are vital to forensic mental health practitioners, however. --Mattisse 20:03, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- P.S. Forensic mental health practitioners have to use the legal language of attorneys for any credibility in reports to judges and courtroom testimony. However, if you can make the article more legible that would be great. The best help is when an occasional attorney stops by one of my attempts at these articles on legal decisions and corrects a misuse of a legal word! --Mattisse 20:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
His fate
editI wanted to add a 'subsequent events' section discussing his rehearing. Must have concluded with a life sentence since he doesn't appear to be on death row in Maryland nor is he on the list of the executed. There are eight people named Wiggins in prison in Maryland as of this writing. Any information is appreciated. Tempshill (talk) 05:39, 28 February 2009 (UTC)