- Long term goal: return to featured status
Article structure has been significantly changed and needs fixing and further improvement.See if anything from Italian page can be used to improve this one.Consider implementing any suggestions made by the most recent peer review, including the automated peer-review suggestions.Implement suggestions made by the 2012 Peer Review.Improve/Add Citations
Fix the problems that were found in the 2012 FACAdd demographic information from pew report [1]Stylistic problems, specifically:
...the single-sentence paragraphs, the lack of flow within paragraphs, the broken connections between paragraphs, the weak large-scale architecture in the article, the huge number of references for a paltry amount of data, the lack of distinction between important and trivial facts.
- Record a new audio file once it reaches FA standard
- Other:
- Is it worth having an FAQ like other heavy traffic articles? E.g. "Why should Wikipedia have an article on itself?"
The "sub-articles" that were split off from this article are badly in need of attention, as are several other related articles. The following all need work:
Reliability of WikipediaCriticism of WikipediaWikipedia in popular cultureHistory of Wikipedia — this one in particular is missing information and should be reorganized
Can we get the first three of these into a template somehow?- Many other language Wikipedia articles of questionable notability, particularly the smallest ones. A thorough going through is needed, with non-notable articles being AFD material.
- Images: update graph in history section
 |
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
|
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wikipedia/to do" page.
