This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I don't have time to build up the article, but notability concerns were assuaged by the NYTime blog piece and by this Forbes piece]. There should be room for more meat here, if anyone cares to build it. --Nat Gertler (talk) 20:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. And it WILL become more notable as that technology advances. If there are any takers on research to go into this article, please by all means jump on in. Thebestofall007 (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2012 (UTC)