This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Wilhelm Harnisch is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I have removed the primary sources tag oadded by another inexperienced editor, no doubt in good faith. Wikipedia:Reliable sources requires Reliable sources are authors or publications regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. Reliable publications are those with an established structure for fact-checking and editorial oversight. The reliability of a source depends on the context ... For the question of how long Harnisch has been with the MBA and the fact that the has been in the housing industry before that, a sworn statement to that effect before the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, even if the sworn statement is made by the person himself, and recorded in a published transcript of the Commission could be said to meet WP:RS. No futher assertions are claimed against that reference.--Golden Wattle talk01:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Note also that Wikipedia:Verifiability policy also has a sub-section on self-published sources - see WP:SELFPUB. It states:
Material from self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources in articles about themselves, so long as:
it is relevant to their notability;
it is not contentious;
it is not unduly self-serving;
it does not involve claims about third parties;
it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the subject;
there is no reasonable doubt as to who wrote it;
the article is not based primarily on such sources.
There is nothing contentious about Harnsich's title or how long he has been with MBA. There is nothing "self-serving" in the statement supported by the cite. --Golden Wattle talk04:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply