Talk:William Banting

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Barry Groves quote

edit

The quote from Groves is an accurate quote of what he said, Banting and ...

...but he was wrong. Other eponyms that are verbs are...

David.Throop (talk) 01:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mannafredo (talk) 11:53, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

http://www.l o w c a r b.ca/corpulence/corpulence_full.html ...

I cannot post any references to this. The link is to the fulltext of bantings Letter on Corpulence, FOURTH Edition, the preface of which contains much biographical material, acknowledgements of Dr Harvey's sources and other interesting information. www.lowcarb.ca may be a controversial site for some, but it reeks of censorship to continue blocking the posting of links to this site. After all, if you are prevented from referencing things from certain sources, is this not opening the door to bias? Is someone able to fix this block? Petlif (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Low Carb vs Low Glycaemic Index?

edit

Banting's diet is based on avoiding sugar altogether, rarely having flour and limiting root vegegables. It is not primarily a low carb diet, and as such it is more in the direction of a low glycaemic index (GI) diet. But of course, the Low GI diet is usually co-packaged with a low-fat approach. Banting's dietary approach thus seems to fall somewhere in the middle. Petlif (talk) 22:57, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Notablitiy

edit

If anyone still doubts that Banting is notable, check out the 126 hits on him in Google Scholar. David.Throop (talk) 02:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

I replaced a link because a previous editor found it got caught by a spam filter. That site gets a green check mark from my McAfee SiteAdvisor. So all I can say is sorry about that, it caught me by surprise; even though I did do due diligence, or thought I had. The new link leads to a page identical in appearance to the old. It too is green on McAfee's checker. Navy.enthusiast (talk) 19:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

More on a modern view

edit

Has any modern research been conducted on the effectiveness and/or safety of the diet Banting advocated? I think it would be an excellent thing to include, if the data is available.

99.231.110.182 (talk) 23:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Banting in Swedish language

edit

In Swedish the words "banta" (to lose weight) and "bantning" (method for loosing weight) is derived from Bantings name. Maybe this should be mentioned in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.243.85 (talk) 08:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Revisionist history?

edit

To simply say that it was the first low refined-carb diet is a bit revisionist. Among the largest changes Banting made was eliminating milk and butter from his diet, and his diet included 2 ounces of bread a day. (Also, first? https://archive.org/stream/letteroncorpulen00bantrich#page/42/mode/2up mentions a diet approved by John Jackson found in the work of John Sinclair that predated Banting's and was similarly low refined-carb; it permitted only stale bread.) --Elvey (talk) 21:47, 11 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Banting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply