Talk:William Blake's Illustrations of the Book of Job

You really should cover the sets of watercolours in more detail, with locations etc. I am surprised at the authorities refed as saying the prints are Blake's masterpiece in the visual arts - are you sure they didn't mean the watercolours? Even that would be dispuited by many. The article should use UK ENglish - see WP:ENGVAR. But a welcome addition. Johnbod (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, both of the sources cited discuss only the engravings, so I suppose they would be partial. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll try to add sections on the Linell set and the Butts set. I don't have printed references for the two sets, but the Blake Archive has lots of good info. Lithoderm (talk) 15:38, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts#William Blake's Illustrations of the Book of Job

I almost entirely wrote this article, and am interested in having some feedback on it. It is probably my largest contribution to Wikipedia as of yet, and this would be very useful to me. It would also be nice to have it reassessed, as I think it is better than a stub, but have no experience with rating articles. Thanks, Lithoderm (talk) 03:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I think the article is off to a terrific start. It needs to be expanded, and some sections like Artistic influences need to move; and it needs more copyediting, I think there must be other artists besides Durer that conspired to influence Blake. The article has good potential, and I have tentatively given it a C grade. It's better than Start. IMHO I don't feel that it's ready yet but good beginning, it feels a little claustraphobic and needs to link to other artists and articles. Modernist (talk) 03:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Agree with those comments, & I have made more at the talk page. Johnbod (talk) 15:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)