Talk:William C. Gorgas

Latest comment: 5 months ago by SalaDitman in topic Citation needed for Findlay skepticism
edit

Hello,

There is an article on the Encyclopedia of Alabama that might be worthy of an external link from this text. Please visit http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/face/Article.jsp?id=h-1048 to view the article. I used to work for the EOA, so I have an interest in promoting the project, something that is unethical on WIkipedia. Please review the link and decide whether it is relevant.

Thanks, 22star (talk) 14:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William C. Gorgas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed for Findlay skepticism

edit

> At first, Finlay's strategy was greeted with considerable skepticism and opposition to such hygiene measures.

This statement appears to contradict reports that his theory was well received on Walter Reed’s legacy page:

> He presented this theory at the 1881 International Sanitary Conference, where it was well received. SalaDitman (talk) 01:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply