Talk:William Cavendish, Earl of Burlington
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of William Cavendish, Earl of Burlington be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editIn the announcement of his engagement in The Times today he is called "the Earl of Burlington", so he obviously hasn't moved up the titles as we had assumed he had. Proteus (Talk) 09:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes I noticed that, rather inconsiderate of him!Alci12 15:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Hm, not sure about this. I would argue that he is the Marquess of Hartington (indeed, he is referred to as such in Burke's Peerage), but has chosen to remain known as Bill Burlington. This isn't uncommon: Michael Ancram did the same. His name is Michael Kerr, but he was the Earl of Ancram when he entered Parliament and styled himself as Michael Ancram (to avoid confusion regarding titles and eligibility for the lower house, one assumes). When his father died and he became a Marquess, he remained Michael Ancram in Parliament.
Wouldn't it make more sense to move this to William Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington, and retain the section explaining that he's still known as Bill Burlington? Obviously, happy to listen to other ideas if I've got it wrong. Phettyplace (Talk) 07:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
I should add that I've seen there's been discussion of this before, I was just wondering if there were any actual evidence that he hasn't taken up the courtesy title beyond newspaper articles referring to him as the Earl of Burlington, which could after all merely be confused by the fact he chooses to be known as Bill Burlington?
As I say, very happy to be corrected. Phettyplace (Talk) 07:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Isn't actually more appropriate to say he doesn't "use" the title? I don't really think he can decide whether or not to actually assume it.Flyte35 (talk) 21:11, 11 April 2013 (UTC)