Talk:William Fuller (American football)/GA1
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Jackyd101 in topic GA Reassessment
GA Reassessment
editThis article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, --Jackyd101 (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Prose is of a high standard, although remember that numbers less than ten should be written using letters rather than numerals. --Jackyd101 (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Images would be very nice nad it is a shame the article is currently without any.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail: