Talk:William H. Lacy Jr.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Miaers notes: "Notability backed by google search result. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=William+H.+Lacy&btnG=Google+Search 2,010,000)"

I disagree on two grounds. First, A quick look through the first 50 Google results of those 2,010,000 entries only 13 of the first 20 are for this William H. Lacy. Second, these 13 are nearly all SEC filings or standard "company important person" listings based on information from those SEC filings. By my reading this doesn't meet any of the possible criteria for notable people. I don't even see any fluff pieces in industry rags.

Please mention here if you think this should be nominated for speedy deletion, or if we should go through the WP:AFD process.Gruber76 03:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

That's still notable enough. He is even in the NNDB. Miaers 13:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

That's evidence, but it's from a tertiary source, which makes it a little shaky. Are there other entries in Wikipedia where the primary qualification for notability is an entry in the NNDB? (The NNDB entry was of the type I was indicating when I said "standard 'company important person' listings.") Gruber76 15:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

NNDB is actually more selective in notability. 13/20 of 2,010,000 is still a very large number. Notable enough. Miaers 16:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

But it's still a tertiary source. I've looked through about 60 links, now, and have yet to find any independent secondary sources, much less "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." (Note that per Wikipedia's notability guidelines a "source" in this context includes secondary sources, but not tertiary sources. NNDB appears to be a tertiary source) I'm going to open up an AfD to bring in some other perspectives. Gruber76 18:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic