Talk:William Hamm Jr.
Latest comment: 5 hours ago by Red-tailed hawk in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit
( )
- ... that the first time the FBI successfully used silver nitrate to lift fingerprints was when solving the kidnapping of a brewery executive?
- Source: "Barker/Karpis Gang". Famous Cases and Criminals. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved December 2, 2024.
- ALT1: ... that William Hamm Jr., the president of Hamm's Brewery, was kidnapped and held for $100,000 ransom? Source: "Barker/Karpis Gang". Famous Cases and Criminals. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved December 2, 2024.
- ALT2: ... that the first successful uses of silver nitrate to lift fingerprints were on ransom notes for William Hamm Jr., president of Hamm's Brewery? Source: "Barker/Karpis Gang". Famous Cases and Criminals. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved December 2, 2024.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Blooming Onion
- Comment: Open to suggestions on hook phrasing
Converted from a redirect by Darth Stabro (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.
~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 13:52, 2 December 2024 (UTC).
- I'll take a look at this one. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - The article gives the time of the kidnapping as
June 15, 1933, at 12:15 p.m.
, but the cited source gives the time that Hamm was last sean as 12:20. Can you explaim where the 12:15 time comes from? - Neutral: - The article currently states in WP:WIKIVOICE that
Hamm married Dorothy Heywood on October 1, 1927
, which is supported by the second cited source. However, the first cited source gives the marriage as having been in November 1927. Unless there is a very good reason for rejecting one source in favor of the other, we should probably not be so definite in the article. Can you explain a bit about this editorial choice? - Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Not much to add to the above, though it's possible I missed something in my spot checks. Generally quite an interesting read. I prefer hook Alt2, as it has his name and mentions the silver nitrate; this is a biography, not an article on the event that is his kidnapping. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- User:Red-tailed hawk good catch on the marriage date there, I genuinely hadn't noticed. The source with the November date I had used to get her maiden name and I didn't realize the mismatch. These all seem to indicate the October date. As for the time of kidnapping, on that same page 12:15pm is also indicated under the "Events in Kidnapping" side column. I'll amend it to "shortly after noon". ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 05:08, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- I had missed the side column; no need to correct that part, the decision makes sense. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- In light of the above, this looks good to go. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:27, 4 December 2024 (UTC)