This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
A fact from William Hankford appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 July 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
While chief justices of England at that time were far more political and far less incorruptible, it seems odd nowadays that an upholder of the law should order an employee not to warn off or to apprehend an intruder but to kill him. Odder still, exactly the same story is told of a Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, Sir Robert Danby who died 51 years later in 1474.[1] It is beyond belief that two senior judges should commit the crime of suicide in the same half-century in the same unique way. Belle Fast (talk) 10:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
