Talk:William Hughes

---

what is the difference between shakespeares poetry and prose--Tishabelle 14:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

If William Shakespeare or related articles don't answer it, you'd better put this question at Talk:William Shakespeare instead, here noone will find it. andy 19:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

William Hughes

It's not appropriate to comment like that on someone here, and earlier versions said worse. See WP:BLP, which is policy. Regardless of that, should he be listed at all? I doubt that he'd be notable enough for an article, and if he isn't, there's not much point in including him on this page. Any thoughts? SlimVirgin ^(talk) 03:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Hmm... I think that He should be listed at all because He is notable for Wikipedia's article, and also good article. *~Daniel~* ☎ 03:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

An article on him has already been twice created at William Hughes (writer), and twice deleted as an attack page. Snottygobble 03:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Daniel, can you tell us what you know about him that'd make him notable? SlimVirgin ^(talk) 03:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually I don't know about him, but I guess He is notable. I'm not sure. If article goes worse, it should be deleted anyways. As Snottygobble said on above, it's been deleted as an attack. *~Daniel~* ☎ 03:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Daniel. I think we should remove his name from this page. If someone creates an article, and it doesn't get deleted, then we can add it back. But at the moment, it's just a red link with little hope of becoming an article, and it's acting as a magnet for trouble, so it's best removed. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 04:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)