This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
A very well-written article. A few comments before I can pass it for GA:
"Though the district that had not elected a Democrat to the House in twenty years, Fields won the election." (Political career) This sentence is somehow incomplete - it doesn't make any sense.
"His administration also saw..." (Political career) Administrations don't see things. These needs to be rephrased.
All one-two sentence paragraphs must either be expanded or merged with the surrounding paragraphs, as they cannot stand alone. (Later life and death)
Other than that, a short article, but it seems to cover everything fairly well. It looks like he was in and out of the public eye fairly quickly. Anyhow, I am putting the article on hold for a period of up to seven days so that these concerns may be addressed, after which it may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work thus far. Cheers, CP00:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I do have one extra thing that needs to be addressed. The section under "Later life and death" that you added (the end of the first paragraph) requires a citation. Cheers, CP20:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Looks good to me, so I'll be passing it for Good Article status. Congratulations, and thank you for your hard work! Cheers, CP00:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply