Talk:William Ketel/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

• Hello Ealdgyth, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you shortly. I hope you find my feedback helpful. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 01:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

  Is this review still going on? Just asking since it dosen't seem like this page has been updated. If you would like I can help. — I'ma editor2022 ^{(🗣️💬 |📖📚)} 03:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• Just a suggestion, but it's if possible to source, an image of his works (in the Rolls Series) could be an improvement for the article.

Assessment

1. Comprehension:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(b) (MoS)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

2. Verifiability:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(c) (original research)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No copyright violation or plagiarism found.	Pass

3. Comprehensiveness:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(b) (focused)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

4. Neutrality:

Notes	Result
The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

5. Stability:

Notes	Result
The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

6. Illustration: Illustrations are not necessary for this short article.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	N/A	Neutral
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	N/A	Neutral

 

---

• Inactive reviewer, second opinion requested on [Talk page]. Review is taken over.

 

Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

 

---

Observations

Document statistics

• HTML document size: 51 kB
• Prose size (including all HTML code): 5318 B
• References (including all HTML code): 1083 B
• Wiki text: 5735 B
• Prose size (text only): 3531 B (593 words) "readable prose size"
• References (text only): 174 B

Page Information

• Page views in the past 30 days = 1,062
• 90 day page views = 168, daily average = 2 views
• Date of page creation = 11:09, 5 January 2016
• Date of latest edit = 15:51, 28 May 2022
• Total number of edits = 47 by 12 editors
• Most of the edits on this page occurred in 2016 ...
• Bots on page noted; no Clue BotNT noted, no vandalism noted. Page considered stable.

Images

• File:William Kitel - Miracula Sancti Johannis.png = Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication
• Image is tagged and CCbySA remit given; appropriate use with suitable caption

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Short Article and GA Status

• A short article is regarded as less than 25kb. This article is 51kb (see above)
• Good Article Talk Archives advise, A good article may be of any length, as long as it properly addresses all major aspects of the topic.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

• Well scribed. Clear, crisp text.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

• References identified as reliable sources.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

• Well referenced and keeps the focus on the work of Ketel.

1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

• NPOV is preserved in this article.

Good Article Criteria

1. The article should be clearly written, in good prose, with correct spelling and grammar.
2. The article should be factually accurate according to reliable sources
3. The article should broadly cover the topic without unnecessary digressions.
4. The article should be stable, with no ongoing edit wars.
5. The article should comply with image use policy.
6. The article is free of obvious copyright violations.

• There being no failures of the Six Good Article Criteria, the article qualifies as GA. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)